Article critique is an integral part of undergraduate or postgraduate courses in most colleges and universities. The articles for which an article critique or review needs to be written are related to the subject of the student. And they require an in-depth understanding of the article.
Article critiques are more or less related to book reviews in the sense that one has to understand the author’s perspective, purpose, and contention behind the work. As mentioned, earlier, it requires, one to study the article in depth. The main purpose of writing an article critique or article review is to present what the article has to offer in terms of the subject matter. In other words, an article critique or article review is more or less writing a summary of the article, a summary that is about 700 to 1000 words.
Sometimes, writing an article critique might become very difficult and it can give nightmares to the student because of the fact that scores from article critiques could be added to the final score. This thought can create more problems.
At HelpWithAssignment, we have a dedicated team of tutors who can offer article review or article critique assignment help to college and university students. For this purpose, our tutors thoroughly study the article and help you in writing a good article critique by providing good perspectives about the article and the author’s intention. An article critique also needs to be very precise and concise in giving out views about the article. And our tutors help you in writing such views for the article critique.
What is Article Critique?
An article critique is a formal evaluation of a piece of writing, typically an article that has been published in a scholarly journal or academic publication. It typically involves a critical analysis of the author’s argument, the evidence they use to support it, and the overall structure and style of the piece. A critique may also include an evaluation of the methodology used in the study, as well as any limitations or weaknesses in the research. The goal of a critique is to provide a detailed and constructive assessment of the article, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses and suggesting areas for improvement.
How To Write An Article Critique?
Writing an article critique typically involves the following steps:
- Read the article carefully and take notes as you read.
- Summarize the main argument or findings of the article in your own words.
- Evaluate the evidence and arguments presented in the article. Consider the sources used, whether they are credible and whether they are appropriate for the argument being made.
- Assess the methodology used in the study, including the sample size, data collection methods, and statistical analysis.
- Evaluate the structure and style of the article, including the organization of ideas, the use of visuals, and the overall readability.
- Identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article, and suggest areas for improvement.
- Write a clear and well-organized critique, using evidence from the article to support your evaluations and critiques.
When writing an article critique, it is important to maintain a neutral and objective tone and to avoid using overly critical language. Instead, focus on providing constructive feedback that will help the author improve their work.
When you are done, it’s a good idea to re-read and proofread your critique, to ensure that your critique is clear and well-written.
If you’re struggling with how to critique a piece of work, be sure to consult your course materials or Blackboard for instructions from your lecturer. As an example, here is a template that achieves the key elements of critiquing.
Typically, the introduction is short (less than 10% of the word length) and you should:
- name the work being reviewed as well as the date it was created and the name of the author/creator
- describe the main argument or purpose of the work
- The context in which the work was created is an important aspect to consider when analyzing it. This may involve its relation to the creator’s life experience, any social or political influences that affected it, or how it fits into a certain artistic or scholarly tradition. All these elements provide valuable insight into the artwork and can help us further understand its significance.
- have a concluding sentence that signposts what your evaluation of the work will be – for instance, it may indicate whether it is a positive, negative, or mixed evaluation.
A summary should provide a concise overview of the main points and ideas discussed in the piece, as well as how it has been portrayed. This may include the use of various techniques, styles, media, characters, or symbols. A strong summary for a critique will focus more on discussing and analyzing these elements rather than providing an extensive review of the work itself.
This section should give a systematic and detailed assessment of the different elements of the work, evaluating how well the creator was able to achieve the purpose through these. For example, you would assess the plot structure, characterization, and setting of a novel; an assessment of a painting would look at composition, brush strokes, color, and light; a critique of a research project would look at subject selection, design of the experiment, analysis of data and conclusions.
A thorough assessment of a piece of work doesn’t just point out the cons. It involves thorough scrutiny, looking at both the positive and negative aspects. It entails evaluating the success of work in relation to its ultimate objective.
Examples of key critical questions that could help your assessment include:
- Who is the creator? Is the work presented objectively or subjectively?
- What are the aims of the work? Were the aims achieved?
- What techniques, styles, and media were used in the work? Are they effective in portraying the purpose?
- What assumptions underlie the work? Do they affect its validity?
- What types of evidence or persuasion are used? Has the evidence been interpreted fairly?
- How is the work structured? Does it favor a particular interpretation or point of view? Is it effective?
- Does the work enhance understanding of key ideas or theories? Does the work engage (or fail to engage) with key concepts or other works in its discipline?
This evaluation is written in a formal academic style and logically presented. Group and order your ideas into paragraphs. Start with the broad impressions first and then move into the details of the technical elements. For shorter critiques, you may discuss the strengths of the works, and then the weaknesses. In longer critiques, you may wish to discuss the positive and negative of each key critical question in individual paragraphs.
To support the evaluation, provide evidence from the work itself, such as a quote or example, and you should also cite evidence from related sources. Explain how this evidence supports your evaluation of the work.
This is usually a very brief paragraph, which includes:
- a statement indicating the overall evaluation of the work
- a summary of the key reasons, identified during the critical evaluation, why this evaluation was formed
- in some circumstances, recommendations for improvement on the work may be appropriate.
Include all resources cited in your critique. Check with your lecturer/tutor for which referencing style to use.
- Mentioned the name of the work, the date of its creation, and the name of the creator.
- Accurately summarised the work being critiqued?
- Mainly focused on the critical evaluation of the work?
- Systematically outlined an evaluation of each element of the work to achieve the overall purpose.
- I used evidence, from the work itself as well as other sources, to back and illustrate my assessment of elements of the work.
- Formed an overall evaluation of the work, based on critical reading?
- Used a well-structured introduction, body, and conclusion?
- Used correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation; clear presentation; and appropriate referencing style.
Why Choose HelpWithAssignent.com For Article Critique Assignment Help?
Plagiarism-free content: Professional and experienced writers work on the assignments and provide the best quality assignment papers from scratch. All the papers produced are original and without plagiarism. All the papers are run through Turnitin to check their originality.
Customized Assignment: Every requirement is different from others. Some assignments need a particular writing style and some need a particular referencing style. So assignment help will be customized according to the requirement of the student.
100% Reasonable: We provide the best services in the industry and our charges are very reasonable. Our prices are affordable for students and we offer discounts for recurring clients.
Ph.D. Experts: All the experts at HelpwithAssignment hold doctorate degrees in their respective fields. Also, they possess immense knowledge of the subject which is an added advantage for students.
On-time Delivery: Once we take up your assignment, don’t about the process and submission date. We complete your assignment within the given time and also provide enough time to proofread and make some necessary changes.
Cash Back Guarantee: Sometimes things just don’t work out in the way we expect them to! If you are not satisfied with the solution we have sent, we promise full cash back.
Want to know how to proceed?
Fill up the assignment help request form on the right or drop us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org. Feel free to contact our customer support on the company 24/7 Live chat or call us at 312-224- 1615.