Solution Library

Quality Control Report of a Manufacturing Company

Question

Managing Quality

Westover Electrical, Inc. is a medium-size Houston manufacturer of wire windings used in making electric motors. Joe Wilson, VP operations, has experienced an increasing problem with rejected product found during the manufacturing operation. "I’m not sure where to begin," admitted Joe at the weekly meeting with his boss. "Rejects in the Winding Department have been killing us the past two months. Nobody in operations has any idea why. I have just brought in a consultant, Roger Gagnon, to take a look at the situation and make recommendations about how we can find out what is going on. I don’t expect Roger to make technical recommendations–just see if he can point us in the right direction."

Gagnon’s first stop later that day was the production floor. His discussions with the production supervisors in the Winding Department indicated that they had no real grasp of what the problem was or what to do to correct it. A tour of the winding operation indicated that there were three machines that wound wire onto plastic cores to produce the primary and secondary electric motor windings. After inspection by quality control (QC), these windings then went to the Packaging Department. Packaging personnel, Gagnon found, inspect their own work and make corrections on the spot. The problem is that too many windings are found to be defective and require reworking before they can be packaged.

Gagnon’s next stop was the Quality Control Department, where he obtained the records for the past month’s Winding Department rejects.

 

TABLE 1. January Transformer Reject Log: Winding Process

 

Date

 

 

Number of Reject Units by Cause

 

 

 

 No Inspected

 Winder Unit No

 Bad Wire

 Twisted Wire

 Brocken leads

 Abraded wire

 Wrong Core

 Wrong wire

 Failed   electricaltest

1

100

1

1

0

4

1

0

0

1

 

100

2

2

1

0

0

1

5

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

5

0

0

3

2

100

1

0

1

3

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

3

1

0

0

2

3

0

 

100

3

0

0

1

6

0

0

0

3

100

1

1

0

0

2

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

 

100

3

0

0

1

4

0

0

3

4

100

1

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

3

1

0

3

5

100

1

0

1

5

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

1

 

100

3

0

0

0

3

0

0

2

8

100

1

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

3

0

0

3

9

100

1

0

1

2

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

3

0

0

4

10

100

1

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

5

0

0

4

11

100

1

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

4

0

0

4

12

100

1

0

0

3

0

1

0

0

 

100

2

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

5

0

0

4

15

100

1

0

0

2

0

0

1

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

 

 

100

3

0

0

0

3

0

0

3

16

100

1

0

0

6

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

3

0

0

3

17

100

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 

100

3

0

0

0

3

0

0

3

18

100

1

1

0

2

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

4

0

0

1

19

100

1

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

3

0

0

1

22

100

1

0

1

4

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

3

0

1

2

23

100

1

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 

100

3

0

0

0

4

0

0

3

24

100

1

0

0

2

0

0

1

0

 

100

2

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

4

0

0

3

25

100

1

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

2

0

0

4

26

100

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

 

 

100

3

0

0

0

2

0

0

3

29

100

1

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

2

0

0

3

30

100

1

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

 

100

2

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

 

100

3

0

0

0

2

0

0

3

 

Note: Assume that each defective unit was rejected because of one single defect.

Source: Professor Victor E. Sower, Ph.D., C.Q.E., Sam Houston State University.

 

QUESTIONS:

 1. Prepare an outline for Roger Gagnon’s report.

 2. What charts, graphs, computer printouts, and so forth might be included in the report?

 3. Prepare Gagnon’s recommendation, with justification, on one page.

 4. Prepare the detail necessary to supplement Gagnon’s recommendation and justification so that Joe Wilson will understand how Gagnon arrived at his

    recommendations

 

Summary

This question belongs to operations management and discusses about quality control of a manufacturing company.

Total word count: 588

 

 

 

Download Full Solution

Comments

  • HWA
    Rasha

    this is a very good website

  • HWA
    maani

    I have 50 questions for the same test your page is showing only 28

  • HWA
    joeanne

    hi can you please help or guide me to answer my assignments. thanks

  • HWA
    joeanne

    hi can anyone help or guide me to my assignments. thanks

  • HWA
    Monik


  • HWA
    Cristina

    This solution is perfect ...thanks

  • HWA
    Janete

    Hello Allison,I love the 2nd image that you did! I also, had never heard of SumoPaint, is something that I will have to exolpre a bit! I understand completely the 52 (or so) youtube videos that you probably watched. Sometimes they have what you want, sometimes they don't! However, it is always satisfying when you are able to produce something that you have taught yourself. Great job!Debra 0 likes

  • HWA
    Sandeep

    Perfect bank of solution. 

  • HWA
    Oxana

    great !

  • HWA
    Paul Brandon-Fritzius

    thanks for the quick response. the solution looks good. :)

  • HWA
    tina Johnson

    thnx for the answer. it was perfect. just the way i wanted it. 

  • HWA
    Giuseppe

    works fine.